rpm-version - Man Page
RPM version system
Synopsis
Description
A label known as EVR is used to refer to software versions in RPM, consisting of up to three components:
- Version reflects the actual packaged software version.
- Release reflects packaging revisions within that software version.
- Epoch is an artificial override to allow working around versioning anomalies.
Only the Version component is mandatory in an EVR label. All RPM packages have a Version and a Release, however.
Version
The VERSION string reflects the actual packaged software version.
The string consists of ASCII alphanumeric characters, optionally segmented with the separators period (.), underscore (_) and the plus sign (+), and operators tilde (~) and caret (^).
The operators are used to map pre- and post-release version strings into a coherent upgrade.
Notably, the dash character (-) can NOT be used in VERSION or Release as it is the component separator.
Release
The RELEASE reflects a revision within a single software version. Ideally, RELEASE is a simple integer that is incremented whenever changes are made to a package, and should be reset (to 1) whenever the software version changes.
Technically, the format is exactly the same as for Version.
Epoch
The EPOCH is a non-negative integer, separated from the version with a colon (:). It's the most significant part of an EVR, skewing version comparison to make an older version to appear newer. It's sometimes necessary to work around version anomalies such as a software project changing its versioning scheme, but also packaging errors.
An omitted EPOCH has an implicit value of zero.
The epoch should be only used as a last resort. It violates the principle of least surprise, and changing it requires all related versioned dependencies in other packages to be updated accordingly.
Comparing
Two EVRs are compared left to right, one component at a time. The components are compared left to right, a segment at a time. The comparison stops as soon as a segment or component level difference is found, so if eg. the epochs differ, the rest of the EVR is not considered at all.
Within components, consecutive alphabetic characters and consecutive numbers form implicit segments. Explicit segments are denoted by separators and operators. Numeric segments are compared numerically as integers with leading zeros ignored, otherwise lexicographical comparison is used. That is, abc123 consists of two segments: abc and 123 and is equal to abc0123, abc.123 and abc.000123 despite difference in appearance.
Numeric segments are considered newer than alphabetic segments regardless of the actual content. When otherwise equal, the component with more segments is considered newer, and similarly an EVR with more components is considered newer. For example, 0.0 is newer than 0 and 1.xyz is older than 1.0 but newer than 1.
The segment separator characters are not compared, so they can be used interchangeably, and multiple consecutive separators are treated as if only one separator was used. Thus, 1.0 is equal to 1+0 and 1+.+0.
The tilde operator causes a segment to sort older, and is used for pre-release versions. For example 2.0~beta1 is older than 2.0 or 2.0~rc1, and newer than 1.0. The caret operator is essentially the opposite of tilde. It causes a segment to sort newer, and is used for post-release snapshots that exist between actual software releases. For example, 2.0^150825 is newer than 2.0 but older than 2.0.1.
Examples
- 123
A simple one-segment version 123. Newer than 99, older than 321.
- 1.0.1
A segmented version string 1.0.1, such as commonly used in software projects to indicate major.minor.micro semantics. Newer than 1.0, older than 1.0.2.
- 2.60.1-1
First release of version 2.60.1. Newer than 2.0 or 2.60, but older than 3.0.
- 1.0-5
Fifth release of version 1.0, newer than 1.0 or 1.0-1, older than 1.0.1.
- 5:3.0-1
First release of version 3.0, with epoch of 5. Newer than for 6.0-1, or 4:6.0-1, older than 5:3.1-1.
- 1.0~beta2
Pre-release beta2 of version 1.0. Newer than 0.99 and 1.0~beta1, older than 1.0.
- 2.0^20250611
Post-release snapshot 20250611 of version 2.0. Newer than 2.0, older than 2.0.1.
Bugs
Various non-obvious behaviors and dark corners exist within the version comparison algorithm, but are difficult to address due to high risk of breaking existing packages:
- Non-ASCII characters are ignored and thus equal: 1.1.α equals 1.1.β and even 1.1.ββ. rpmbuild(1) rejects such EVRs but it's possible to encounter "illegal" values via API usage, very old packages and packages created with 3rd party tools.
- Implicit segments can be deceptive: 1.f is newer than 1c.f. The result becomes more obvious by making the segments explicit: 1.f is newer than 1.c.f because the segments are compared one by one, and c sorts lower than f lexicographically.
http://www.rpm.org/
Referenced By
rpm(8), rpm-lua(7), rpm-scriptlets(7), rpmsort(1).